Improving Documentation & Examples for llama-cpp-python – Looking for Volunteers #116
JamePeng
announced in
Announcements
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hi! I'd love to contribute to the multimodal documentation, since it's the part of the code I've looked more. I haven't got any problems with the current documentation, however, I think it will be easier for most people to implement a generic multimodal chat handler; one for all models rather than one for each model/architecture. I think this is possible, since all of the current chat handlers uses the same base class and just changes the chat template. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
I'm JamePeng, the current maintainer of this fork (JamePeng/llama-cpp-python).
First of all, a big thank you to abetlen for creating the original llama-cpp-python project — it laid a solid foundation that many of us still rely on today.
The Current Situation
As the llama.cpp backend continues to evolve rapidly, our high-level Python bindings have kept pace with many exciting new features. However, the official documentation (especially in the
/docs/folder and ReadTheDocs) has become quite outdated. Many class usages, parameter explanations, and code examples no longer reflect the current API.This has caused real friction for developers:
Recent Major Improvements in This Fork
In the past few months, we've added or significantly enhanced:
generate()/eval()for better hybrid model support and new LlamaSampler chain API.Qwen35ChatHandlerandQwen3.6template (withpreserve_thinkingsupport)Gemma-4ChatHandler (vision + audio for E2B/E4B models, vision+text for others)These powerful features deserve clearer, more up-to-date documentation and richer examples.
Personal Note & Call for Help
Maintaining this project is a one-person effort on my side. Between a busy day job, frequent migraines, and limited free time, it has become increasingly difficult to keep all files — especially the documentation — comprehensively updated and polished.
I’m seriously considering a complete overhaul of the
docs/section using an LLM Wiki approach: turning the documentation into a living, structured, LLM-maintained wiki that can stay current more easily.Proposal: Let's Build Better Documentation Together
I’d love to open this up to the community and move toward:
Are you interested in helping?
Even small contributions would make a big difference:
If you’d like to contribute, please reply here and let me know:
Together we can make llama-cpp-python not only technically strong but also much more approachable and enjoyable to use.
Thank you in advance for any support or ideas!
Best regards,
JamePeng
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions