Introduce strategy/registry pattern for type handling in _create_output_model()

[dgenio]

Description

Follow-up to #1700 and #2352.

#2352 successfully decomposed func_metadata() into smaller helpers, addressing the first acceptance criterion of #1700. This issue tracks the remaining work: introducing a strategy/registry pattern for type handling.

Problem

_create_output_model() (extracted in #2352) still uses a long chain of if isinstance(...) checks to dispatch to the right model creation strategy for each type family (BaseModel, TypedDict, dataclasses, primitives, GenericAlias, etc.). Adding support for a new type family means modifying this function directly.

Proposal

Introduce a registry-based dispatch for type handling in _create_output_model():

1. Define a protocol/interface for type handlers (e.g., TypeHandler with can_handle(type_expr) -> bool and create_model(type_expr, ...) -> BaseModel | None).
2. Register built-in handlers for the existing type families.
3. Allow external registration of custom type handlers for extensibility.
4. _create_output_model() iterates over registered handlers instead of hardcoded checks.

Why

• Extensibility: New type families can be supported without modifying core dispatch logic.
• Separation of concerns: Each handler encapsulates its own type detection and model creation.
• Testability: Handlers can be tested in isolation.

Acceptance criteria

• Type handling in _create_output_model() uses a registry/strategy pattern.
• Existing type families (BaseModel, TypedDict, dataclass, primitives, GenericAlias) are registered as built-in handlers.
• An API exists to register custom type handlers.
• All existing tests pass without modification.
• New tests cover the registry mechanism and at least one custom handler.

References

• Original issue: Refactor func_metadata() into smaller components for schema & metadata generation #1700 (acceptance criterion 2)
• Refactor PR: refactor: decompose func_metadata() into smaller focused helpers #2352