Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
TY! I'll adjust it and merge after rubocop PR! |
Contributor
|
This works fine, but now I think we may want to use Ruby-based markdown linter instead:
Will compare both and see.. |
tuxmea
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2026
Contributor
|
@jay7x Any news regarding your tests with ruby based markdownlint? |
Contributor
|
Forgot about this tbh.. will try to have a look tonight |
Contributor
|
Well.. I spent some time on this. Below are quick results. NOTES:
|
Contributor
|
Speed-wise I'd say they are quite similar. Strong sides of linters:
|
tuxmea
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.