Skip to content

Schedule: Add unit and integration tests to app/dashboard/prs/page.tsx#839

Open
gitauto-ai[bot] wants to merge 32 commits intomainfrom
gitauto/schedule-20260421-162036-5nf6
Open

Schedule: Add unit and integration tests to app/dashboard/prs/page.tsx#839
gitauto-ai[bot] wants to merge 32 commits intomainfrom
gitauto/schedule-20260421-162036-5nf6

Conversation

@gitauto-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gitauto-ai gitauto-ai Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

Current Coverage for app/dashboard/prs/page.tsx

  • Line Coverage: 0%
  • Statement Coverage: 0%
  • Function Coverage: 0% (Uncovered: L19:PRsPage, L30:(anonymous_3), L35:(anonymous_4), L40:(anonymous_5), L55:(anonymous_6), L64:(anonymous_7), L108:(anonymous_8), L109:(anonymous_9), L112:(anonymous_10), L118:(anonymous_11), L124:(anonymous_12), L129:(anonymous_13), L157:(anonymous_14), L158:(anonymous_15), L168:(anonymous_16), L172:(anonymous_17), L180:(anonymous_18), L181:(anonymous_19), L183:(anonymous_20), L189:(anonymous_21), L191:(anonymous_22), L214:(anonymous_23), L223:(anonymous_24))
  • Branch Coverage: 0% (Uncovered: line 110, block 10, branch 0, line 110, block 10, branch 1, line 110, block 9, branch 0, line 113, block 11, branch 0, line 113, block 12, branch 0, line 113, block 12, branch 1, line 131, block 13, branch 0, line 131, block 13, branch 1, line 161, block 14, branch 0, line 161, block 15, branch 0, line 161, block 15, branch 1, line 161, block 15, branch 2, line 181, block 16, branch 0, line 181, block 16, branch 1, line 181, block 17, branch 0, line 181, block 17, branch 1, line 190, block 18, branch 0, line 191, block 19, branch 0, line 191, block 19, branch 1, line 215, block 20, branch 0, line 215, block 20, branch 1, line 36, block 0, branch 0, line 36, block 0, branch 1, line 41, block 1, branch 0, line 46, block 2, branch 0, line 56, block 3, branch 0, line 56, block 4, branch 0, line 56, block 4, branch 1, line 80, block 5, branch 0, line 80, block 5, branch 1, line 81, block 6, branch 0, line 81, block 6, branch 1, line 83, block 7, branch 0, line 86, block 8, branch 0)

Instructions

Focus on covering the uncovered areas.

Test these changes locally

git fetch origin
git checkout gitauto/schedule-20260421-162036-5nf6
git pull origin gitauto/schedule-20260421-162036-5nf6

What I Tested

I wrote unit tests for PRsPage in app/dashboard/prs/page.test.tsx covering: initial render of "Open Pull Requests" title, localStorage hydration of pr-status-filter and pr-data-{ownerName} cache keys on mount, parallel fetching of getOpenPRNumbers/getPRFiles/getCheckStatusBySHA for all repos in the account context, error propagation to a "Failed to load PR data. Please try again." UI message, filter-select behavior for failed-or-conflicts with safeLocalStorage.setItem side-effect, per-repo reload button triggering slackUs with the expected message format, and partial failure isolation when getPRFiles or getCheckStatusBySHA rejects for an individual PR.

Potential Bugs Found

  • The CI failed after initial push (agent comment shows a fix iteration: it read page.tsx, get-check-status-by-sha.ts, and app/api/github/index.ts to reconcile). The fix was applied directly to the test file (implementation approach 1 - test corrected to match actual signatures/behavior), but the agent stopped before verifying green CI because a concurrent commit landed on the branch.
  • The integration test for real GitHub API access is permanently skipped (approach 2 - it.skip) with a comment citing paid/external API policy. No assertion is made about actual network behavior.
  • None found in the production component itself.

Non-Code Tasks

  • Reviewer should verify CI passes on this branch before merge since the agent stopped mid-fix-cycle due to a concurrent push; the final test file may still reflect the pre-fix or mid-fix state rather than a confirmed green run.
  • Confirm the aria-label="Status Filter" attribute exists on the FilterSelect rendered by PRsPage - the test uses screen.getByLabelText("Status Filter") and will silently fail to find the element if that label is absent.
  • The console.error spy pattern used in several tests suppresses output globally during those tests; verify this does not mask real errors in CI log output for this suite.

@gitauto-ai gitauto-ai Bot requested a review from hiroshinishio April 21, 2026 16:20
@gitauto-ai gitauto-ai Bot added the gitauto label Apr 21, 2026
@gitauto-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gitauto-ai Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

Pull request completed! 🚀

I autonomously open pull requests on a schedule. You can manage your schedule here. Should you have any questions or wish to change settings or limits, please feel free to contact info@gitauto.ai or invite us to Slack Connect.

gitauto-ai Bot and others added 3 commits April 21, 2026 16:25
Co-Authored-By: hiroshinishio <hiroshinishio@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: hiroshinishio <hiroshinishio@users.noreply.github.com>
@gitauto-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gitauto-ai Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

Created an empty commit to re-trigger the test CI. Waiting for results.

@gitauto-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gitauto-ai Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

Created an empty commit to re-trigger the test CI. Waiting for results.

@gitauto-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gitauto-ai Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

Created an empty commit to re-trigger the test CI. Waiting for results.

@gitauto-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gitauto-ai Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

Created an empty commit to re-trigger the e2e CI. Waiting for results.

@gitauto-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gitauto-ai Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

I've made 32 commits trying to fix this, but the tests keep failing with slightly different errors. I'm going to stop here to avoid an infinite loop. Could you take a look?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants