Skip to content

[HZ-5403] Queue for Asyncio Client#788

Merged
yuce merged 3 commits intohazelcast:masterfrom
yuce:asyncio-queue
Apr 6, 2026
Merged

[HZ-5403] Queue for Asyncio Client#788
yuce merged 3 commits intohazelcast:masterfrom
yuce:asyncio-queue

Conversation

@yuce
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@yuce yuce commented Mar 19, 2026

Straightforward port of Queue and its tests to asyncio client.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Mar 19, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.06623% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 94.45%. Comparing base (aa08459) to head (e31b1d6).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
hazelcast/internal/asyncio_proxy/queue.py 89.72% 15 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #788      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.49%   94.45%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         396      397       +1     
  Lines       25670    25821     +151     
==========================================
+ Hits        24256    24390     +134     
- Misses       1414     1431      +17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@yuce yuce requested a review from ihsandemir March 19, 2026 10:19
@yuce yuce requested a review from emreyigit March 30, 2026 12:06
@yuce yuce changed the title Queue for Asyncio Client [HZ-5403] Queue for Asyncio Client Apr 1, 2026
@yuce yuce requested a review from ihsandemir April 6, 2026 09:30
@yuce yuce merged commit 94e769f into hazelcast:master Apr 6, 2026
11 checks passed
@yuce yuce deleted the asyncio-queue branch April 6, 2026 12:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants