Conversation
This is coming from the most recent 4.12.z release (currently 4.12.87). Generated using oc get --raw /openapi/v2 | jq --sort-keys 'del(.parameters, .paths[], .security, .securityDefinitions)' | sed -Ee 's/(Authorization: Bearer sha256)~[^ ]*/\1~REDACTED/;'
|
Since this is not released yet, we probably should force push |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know what this is about, but did you do it? 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm confused, this was already part of #200, per your suggestion.
But I see that I should rebase this PR on current master so that it vanishes from this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My suggestion in #200 was about the sed. This question is about the .info editing. If it's the same thing, then perhaps the README steps should also be combined?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah!
I did have a look and compared with the other files and tbh, I didn't see any need for editing. 🤷
This temporarily points to stackrox/helmtest PR #201 which adds the openshift-4.12 schema needed for the updated tests. Reference: stackrox/helmtest#201
This temporarily points to stackrox/helmtest PR #201 which adds the openshift-4.12 schema needed for the updated tests. Reference: stackrox/helmtest#201
This temporarily points to stackrox/helmtest PR #201 which adds the openshift-4.12 schema needed for the updated tests. Reference: stackrox/helmtest#201
This temporarily points to stackrox/helmtest PR #201 which adds the openshift-4.12 schema needed for the updated tests. Reference: stackrox/helmtest#201
This temporarily points to stackrox/helmtest PR #201 which adds the openshift-4.12 schema needed for the updated tests. Reference: stackrox/helmtest#201
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't the uncompressed internal/schemas/openapi-schemas/openshift-4.12.json added in #200 be removed?
This is coming from the most recent 4.12.z release (currently 4.12.87).
OpenShift 4.12 is currently in the extended support phase in its lifecycle.
Generated using
Note, the
sedpart was required because otherwise thepre-commitcheck would have caught an example token in the included documentation.